Compare

Attack Insights vs Recorded Future

Recorded Future is the best-known threat intelligence platform, with deep coverage of adversaries, forums and marketplaces. Attack Insights ties dark-web intelligence directly to your validated attack surface — turning intel into action rather than another feed.

Definition

What is Recorded Future?

Recorded Future is a global threat intelligence platform, now part of Mastercard, that combines automated collection with expert analysis across the open, deep and dark web. It is known for broad coverage of forums, marketplaces and paste sites, plus strength in geopolitical and nation-state threat tracking.

Comparing more than one option? See the full comparison hub at /compare/.

Why it matters

Where Attack Insights differs

Recorded Future is a powerhouse for standalone threat intelligence and is often the right choice for dedicated intel teams. Attack Insights takes a different angle: DarkThreatX intelligence isn’t a separate feed to triage — it’s woven into testing and attack surface management, so a leaked credential is matched to the exact asset it unlocks and the attack path it enables. Rather than intelligence and exposure living in separate tools, Attack Insights connects who’s targeting you and what’s leaked to what an attacker could actually exploit, in one platform.

Side by side

Attack Insights vs Recorded Future, point by point

Primary focus

Recorded Future: standalone threat intelligence. Attack Insights: dark-web intelligence fused with testing and ASM.

Approach

Recorded Future collects and analyses intel broadly. Attack Insights ties intel to validated, exploitable findings.

Actionability

Intel platforms inform analysts; Attack Insights links leaked data to the assets and paths it affects.

Attack surface

Attack Insights continuously discovers and tests the surface the intelligence relates to.

Dark-web corpus

DarkThreatX draws on a 100B+ record corpus of leaked credentials and threat-actor activity.

Best for

Recorded Future suits dedicated intel teams. Attack Insights suits teams wanting intel tied to exposure and proof.

How it works

How to choose

01

Define the job

Decide whether you need testing, exposure management, threat intelligence — or all three.

02

Compare outcomes

Weigh validated, exploitable findings over raw alert counts.

03

Test the workflow

Check deployment effort, false positives, and how findings reach your team.

04

Add up cost

Compare one platform against the consoles, modules and people in your current stack.

FAQ

Recorded Future comparison FAQs

Is Attack Insights a Recorded Future alternative?

For teams that want dark-web intelligence integrated with testing and ASM, yes. Dedicated intel teams may still want a standalone platform like Recorded Future.

How is DarkThreatX different?

It is built into Attack Insights, matching leaked credentials and threat-actor activity to your validated assets and attack paths.

Can it replace a threat feed?

For many security teams, integrated dark-web intelligence removes the need to triage a separate feed.

Compare on your own attack surface

Book a demo and put Attack Insights head-to-head with Recorded Future on the results that matter.

External Attack Surface

Discover and monitor every internet-facing asset you own.

Detect new CVEs and exposures as they appear.

Find misconfigurations across AWS, Azure and GCP.

Prove your security controls actually work.

Threat & Digital Risk

Our public threat intelligence platform, in real time.

Spot leaked credentials and targeted threats early.

AI-driven prioritisation that cuts through the noise.

Protect your brand, data and people beyond the perimeter.

API & Email Security

Discover and test externally exposed APIs.

Stop spoofing with SPF, DKIM and DMARC checks.

Dashboards and board-ready security reporting.

Continuously test your public web applications.

Stream validated findings to your SIEM, SOAR and ticketing tools.

Explore

See the full Attack Insights platform.

See Attack Insights in action.